Dodgy Public Sector Investments?

 A detailed breakdown of questionable public sector investments across UK councils, health trusts, universities, and more, grouped by institution type and listing specific companies, sectors, and controversies:

Council Pension Funds

Derbyshire County Council

  • Fossil Fuels: Shell, BP, ConocoPhillips

  • Arms: Raytheon (cluster munitions), Lockheed Martin (nuclear weapons), Boeing (fighter jets)

  • Tobacco: British American Tobacco, Philip Morris

  • Mining: Rio Tinto, Glencore (pollution, child labour)

Essex County Council

  • Military-Linked Firms: BAE Systems (Yemen strikes), Tata Group (Myanmar arms)

  • Controversial Commodities: Glencore (corruption), BAT tobacco (health harms)

  • Deflection: Prioritises “maximum return” despite human rights concerns

Kent County Council: £8BN pension fund: council/teachers/police/fire

* £400M Fossil Fuels

* £116M Tobacco

* No details yet on Arms/Gambling etc

Isle of Wight Council

  • Complicity Claims: £31.8m allegedly invested in firms tied to Israeli military

  • Response: Raised in Palestine Solidarity Campaign meetings

Sefton Council

  • Motion Passed: Divest from fossil fuels and arms in April 2025

  • Justification: Climate emergency and ethical governance

Wandsworth Council

  • Fund Value: £3.2 billion

  • Issues: Poor performance, alleged concealment, investment in underperforming equity/property funds

NHS Trusts and PFIs

Barts Health NHS Trust

  • PFI Contracts: Pays >£100 million/year to private contractors

  • Ownership: Several entities linked to offshore accounts and tax havens

General NHS Concerns

  • PFIs: High interest rates, opaque procurement

  • Example Contractors: Carillion (bankrupted), Skanska (labour violations)

Universities

University of Birmingham, Leeds, Imperial College

  • Holdings: Shell, BP, ExxonMobil

  • Ranking: Low scores on People & Planet’s Fossil Free Scorecard

  • Pushback: Alumni and student divestment campaigns

Cambridge and Oxford (partial divestment)

  • Remaining Holdings: Private equity in fossil-linked hedge funds and big pharma

  • Ethical Audits: Often hidden from public view

Transport Sector

Transport for London (TfL)

  • Property Deals: Partnered with developers accused of worker exploitation

  • Rail Bailouts: Abellio and Arriva tied to Dutch/Spanish tax havens

National Rail Franchises

  • Controversies: Govia (fare misreporting), Stagecoach (disqualified from HS2 bidding)

Science and Innovation Grants

Innovate UK and UKRI

  • Shell Firms: Grants occasionally awarded to opaque entities

  • Examples: AI firms with no registered staff or vague technical deliverables

  • Oversight Issues: Minimal post-award review

Local Authority Investment Schemes

Thurrock Council

  • Losses: £655 million in failed solar bond investments

  • Linked Entity: Liam Kavanagh’s Rockfire group

Croydon Council

  • Bankruptcy 2020: High-risk property borrowing and mismanagement

Spelthorne Council

  • Debt Load: £1 billion+ borrowed for commercial property with declining yields

Police and Crime Commissioners

Surveillance Tech Investments

  • Firms: Clearview AI, Palantir (privacy violations abroad)

  • Issues: Hidden procurement contracts, lack of ethical scrutiny

HMRC Pension Fund

Tax Avoidance Conflicts

  • Indirect Holdings: Cayman-based funds

  • Irony Noted: Agency in charge of enforcement linked to avoidance vehicles


A draft policy statement for a blanket exclusion of unethical investments in public sector funds, with provisions for quarterly ethical reviews. Feel free to adapt this for a blog, council motion, or open letter:

Ethical Investment Draft Motion: Public Sector Funds

Title: Motion for Blanket Exclusion of Arms, Fossil Fuels, Tobacco, and Human Rights-Violating Entities in Public Sector Investment Portfolios

Proposer: [Insert Name or Councillor/Public Group] Date: [Insert Date]

Purpose

To uphold ethical stewardship and align public sector investments with climate, peace, and human rights principles by excluding specified sectors and enhancing transparency through quarterly oversight.

Exclusion Criteria

All public sector funds, including but not limited to Local Government Pension Schemes (LGPS), must divest from and exclude:

  1. Fossil Fuels:

    • Oil, gas, and coal extraction companies

    • Fossil-fuel-based power generation

    • Pipeline infrastructure corporations

  2. Arms and Weaponry:

    • Nuclear weapons producers

    • Cluster munitions manufacturers

    • Firms supplying military operations in active conflict zones

  3. Tobacco and Nicotine Corporations:

    • Tobacco cultivation and production companies

    • Nicotine and Vape product firms targeting underage markets

  4. Human Rights Offenders:

    • Corporations complicit in war crimes, apartheid, or forced labour or general labour abuses

    • Entities sanctioned by the UK government or UN for abuses

  5. Gambling Industry

    • Online betting platforms and casino operators

    • Firms profiting from addictive gaming models

    • Companies with poor records on harm reduction or youth exposure

  6. Tax Haven-Linked Entities

    • Firms domiciled in jurisdictions with secrecy laws or zero corporate tax

    • Investment vehicles routed through Panama, Jersey, Cayman Islands, etc.

    • Contractors or suppliers with opaque ownership structures or general tax abuses

Portfolio Audit and Quarterly Review

To enforce this motion:

  • Conduct a full forensic audit of current holdings within 90 days

  • Initiate a quarterly ethical review of investment portfolios

    • Include external experts, civil society observers, and fund members

  • Publish transparent reports online, with:

    • Listed exclusions

    • Rationale for decisions

    • Any breaches or remedial actions taken

Education and Oversight

  • Host annual ethical investment forums for fund members

  • Integrate ethical clauses into procurement and investment tendering

  • Train committee members in ESG (Environment, Social, Governance) metrics and divestment pathways



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Policy #5: Development not Over-Development

As MP I will halt the development boom of Concrete Kent in Thanet. We are overbuilding far beyond South East targets as mere property speculation for the construction industry. I will insist construction is refocused on renovating both public housing and empty properties: over 3,000 empty properties in Thanet - for years - before one brick is laid on new build. The idea of a 4th Town at Westwood Cross should also be ripped up as property and Planning overkill given vacant properties, an ageing population and a failed economy. And on prime farmland when Climate Change is a major issue and Food Security in preserving our farmland to reduce food imports. And of course major derelict brownfield sites such as Manston airport, Richboro: derelict longer than in operation, and many more. Councils are notorious for being focused on property and construction where the main parties get their kickbacks for handing out Planning permissions. Far greater scrutiny of the Planning system is required. A...
Read more

David Cockburn KCC: Parkway and council corruption

(email to David Cockburn KCC CEO 3/3/21 cc Parliament etc as below) Hi David I and others were surprised at an access road for Kent Parkway rail station planned for 15th March without notice/consultation. As you know from KCC's own research the Parkway was overwhelmingly rejected by the public and councillors. And any rail improvements were less than 90 seconds or so(!). Yes, seconds. It seems a massive KCC civil servant white elephant tarmac scheme again: £20M in Whitehall funds were spent on documents? And is it a leftover of the secret KCC attempts to develop Manston as London International airport with KCC quango funds for the Virginia flights that bellyflopped and resulted in the sacking of your predecessor? Can you halt any works at the site for a call-in review and please provide FOI/EIR documents/emails etc of costs/plans etc of this utterly ludicrous project. For clarity the East Kent aquifer for drinking water for 150k people is under the Manston/Parkway r...
Read more

ICC war crimes ASEAN gap

  Here’s a breakdown of the   41 states that have  neither signed nor ratified   the Rome Statute and the   29 states that  signed but did not ratify   it — meaning they are   not full members   of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as of 2025: 41 States That Have Neither Signed Nor Ratified the Rome Statute These countries have  no formal legal ties  to the ICC: Asia-Pacific : China, India, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey, Vietnam, Nepal, Bhutan, Laos, Myanmar, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand Middle East & North Africa : Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Oman, UAE, Bahrain, Lebanon Africa : Angola, Eritrea, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Cameroon Europe : Belarus Americas : Cuba, Nicaragua Others : North Korea, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Azerbaijan 29 States That Signed But Did Not Ratify the Rome Statute These countries  expressed initial support  but never completed the ratification proces...
Read more